A finished ACC-335 Topic 6 user access rights review example, testing system permissions against job duties and tracing each excess right to the transaction it would let one person complete alone. Searches like "acc 335 topic 6 assignment example", "acc335 topic 6 sample" and "acc-335 topic 6 example" land here.
What a finished ACC-335 Topic 6 user access rights review looks like
The finished review works from the system's own export of users and roles, not from the organization chart. Each account is listed with its assigned permissions and the duties the person actually performs, and wherever the two disagree, that difference is the finding. Three gaps are written up. The payroll clerk can add a new employee, approve timesheets and edit direct deposit details, which together allow a fictitious employee to be created, paid and routed to an account the clerk controls. An account belonging to a warehouse supervisor who left the company months ago is still active. Two people share a single administrator login, so nothing done under it can be attributed to either. Each finding names the risk, whether the system log would reveal misuse, and the smallest change in permissions that would close it.
How an ACC-335 Topic 6 example is structured
The review opens by stating its source, the date the permissions report was exported and the system it came from, since access changes constantly and a review is true only as of that day. A second part lists the roles defined in the system and what each permits, which frequently reveals a role broader than its name suggests. A third part pairs each user with a role and with the duties observed, marking every permission the job does not need. A fourth part writes up the three material gaps, one paragraph each, with the transaction every gap would permit. A fifth part checks whether activity under each risky permission is logged and whether anybody reads that log. A sixth part proposes changes. The close sets a review frequency and assigns it to somebody without administrator rights.
The system export as the source
Permissions are taken from the report the software generates on a stated date, because the organization chart describes intended access and the system enforces actual access.
Roles read for what they permit
Each role is expanded into its individual rights, since a role named payroll entry can carry the power to change bank details as well.
Excess rights traced to transactions
Every permission beyond the job's needs is written as the payment or change it would let one person complete without anybody else involved.
Orphaned and shared accounts flagged
The departed supervisor's live account and the shared administrator login are reported separately, because they break attribution rather than segregation.
Logging checked, then reading checked
The review asks whether the system records use of each risky right and whether anybody looks at that record, since an unread log detects nothing.
A reviewer without administrator rights
The recurring review is assigned to a person who cannot alter permissions, so the check is never performed by the account holder it checks.
Where marks go in ACC-335 Topic 6
The weakest reviews describe access in principle and never open the permissions report. Discussing least privilege with no account, role or right named could describe any system, and it finds nothing. Reviews built from job titles repeat what the organization intended and miss the right a role quietly carries. Excess permissions listed without the transaction they permit leave the reader unsure whether a gap is trivial or serious, and a payroll clerk able to create and pay an employee is plainly the latter. Terminated users and shared logins are frequently missed because they are not segregation problems, yet they defeat attribution, which every other control depends on. Recommending that all excess rights be removed, without checking whether a small team needs some of them for coverage, proposes a change the business will reverse within a month.
Get an ACC-335 Topic 6 example written to your instructions
Send the ACC-335 Topic 6 instructions, the rubric your classroom posts and any permissions list or case the assignment includes. You receive a custom example written to those criteria, with access taken from the system rather than the chart, excess rights traced to transactions, logging tested and a reviewer assigned, within 24 to 48 hours. The first one comes free.
ACC-335 Topic 6 questions, answered
Why not rely on the organization chart?
Because the chart records intended responsibility, while the system decides what each login can actually do. Permissions accumulate as people cover for colleagues, change jobs or receive temporary access that nobody removes. The gap between intended and actual access is exactly what the review exists to find, and starting from the chart assumes the answer before looking.
What is least privilege?
The principle that each account should hold only the permissions its user's job requires, and no more. It limits both deliberate misuse and honest mistakes, since a person who cannot post a journal entry cannot post a wrong one. In a small organization it has to be balanced against coverage, and the honest version of the review says where that balance was struck.
How often should access be reviewed?
Often enough that a departed employee's account or a leftover permission does not survive long. Many organizations review on a quarterly cycle, and immediately whenever someone leaves or changes roles. The frequency in the example should follow from the risk it describes, and the review should be performed by somebody who cannot change the permissions being reviewed.