ACC-663 · Topic 3

ACC-663 Topic 3 personal financial statement review example

Personal Financial Advisory Services Grand Canyon University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

The ACC-663 Topic 3 personal financial statement review shown here is finished. It prepares a statement of financial condition and a monthly cash flow statement for a composite one-income household that arrived wanting to start investing, then shows the statements say otherwise: spending runs ahead of take-home pay and a card balance is absorbing the gap. ACC 663 sections generally place this review before any allocation.

What this page holds

A finished ACC-663 Topic 3 personal financial statement review example, measuring net worth at estimated current value, exposing a $250 monthly deficit and ranking three debts before any investing begins. Searches like "acc 663 topic 3 assignment example", "acc663 topic 3 sample" and "acc-663 topic 3 example" land here.

What a finished ACC-663 Topic 3 personal financial statement review looks like

The finished review presents assets at estimated current value, following the personal financial statement guidance in ASC 274: a home at $410,000, a pre-tax retirement account of $186,000, a brokerage account of $42,000 with a $30,000 tax basis, $9,000 of cash and a $14,000 car, for $661,000 in all. Liabilities of $256,400 cover the mortgage, a car loan and a $7,400 card balance. Between liabilities and net worth sits an illustrative $42,720 provision for estimated income taxes on the gap between values and tax bases, almost all of it on the retirement balance, leaving net worth of $361,880. The cash flow statement then sets $5,900 of monthly take-home pay against $6,150 of outflows. The $250 shortfall lands on the card each month, and cash covers under seven weeks of spending.

How an ACC-663 Topic 3 example is structured

The review is built as two statements and a reading of them. A short opening names the household, the date of the statements and the sources behind each figure, statements for balances and an appraisal estimate for the home. The statement of financial condition follows, with assets at estimated current value, liabilities at their current amounts, and the tax provision shown on its own line with the assumed rates labeled. The cash flow statement comes next, drawn from ninety days of account and card activity and splitting fixed commitments from discretionary spending. A debt table then lists the card at an illustrative 23 percent, the $11,000 car loan at 6 percent and the $238,000 mortgage at 4 percent, ranked by cost. A capacity paragraph states what the household can commit each month once the deficit closes. The closing section explains why the investing the clients asked about waits.

Assets at estimated current value

The home, accounts and car are stated at what they would fetch now rather than at cost, as personal financial statements require under ASC 274.

A tax provision below the liabilities

Estimated income taxes on the gap between current values and tax bases appear on their own line, which keeps a pre-tax retirement balance from overstating what the household owns.

The deficit found in the records

Outflows exceed take-home pay by $250 a month, and the cash flow statement traces that gap to the card balance rising by roughly the same amount.

Debts ranked by what they cost

The card, the car loan and the mortgage are ordered by illustrative rate, which places the card first and leaves the mortgage for much later.

Investing deferred with a stated reason

A monthly brokerage contribution would in practice be funded by 23 percent borrowing, so the review defers it until the deficit closes and the card is cleared.

Where marks go in ACC-663 Topic 3

An allocation proposed before the statements are finished is where this review loses most, since the household's capacity has not yet been measured and the plan may rest on money that is not there. Assets listed at cost instead of estimated current value misapply the personal financial statement basis and misstate net worth. Leaving out the estimated tax provision treats a pre-tax retirement balance as if every dollar were spendable, overstating net worth here by $42,720. A cash flow statement built from the clients' estimate rather than records usually misses the deficit entirely, because the card is quietly financing it. Debts listed without rates cannot be ranked, and papers that recommend paying down the mortgage first have ranked by size. Reviews that never state a monthly capacity figure leave the later topics nothing to build on.

Get an ACC-663 Topic 3 example written to your instructions

Send the ACC-663 Topic 3 instructions and rubric, along with the household figures your section assigned. A custom example is written to them: a statement of financial condition at estimated current value, a cash flow statement from records, debts ranked by cost and a capacity figure stated, in 24 to 48 hours. First one free.

ACC-663 Topic 3 questions, answered

Why state assets at current value rather than cost?

Because a personal statement of financial condition answers what the household is worth now, and ASC 274 sets estimated current value as the basis for that reason. Cost would show the brokerage account at $30,000 when it would fetch $42,000. The tax provision then recognizes that turning some of those values into cash would trigger tax, so net worth is stated after it.

Why not invest while paying down the card?

In this case every dollar invested is effectively borrowed at the card's rate, because the household is already spending more than it takes home. An investment would have to beat an illustrative 23 percent, with certainty, to come out ahead. Closing the deficit and clearing the card is the recommendation the figures support; the review revisits investing once a surplus actually exists.

Are the tax rates in the provision current law?

No. They are assumed rates, labeled as such, applied to show how the provision works. The tax that would actually arise on a retirement withdrawal or a sale of shares depends on the year, the household's other income and the rules then in force. The example keeps the mechanism visible and leaves real figures to a preparer working from complete facts.