A finished BUS-390 Topic 3 landed cost analysis example, pricing duties, origin rules and non-tariff costs per unit for one product entering two markets. Searches like "bus 390 topic 3 assignment example", "bus390 topic 3 sample" and "bus-390 topic 3 example" land here.
What a finished BUS-390 Topic 3 landed cost analysis looks like
The example builds a landed cost for the same battery pack into two markets and lets the difference speak. For Canada the question is whether the pack qualifies as North American under the USMCA rules of origin, since its cells are imported from Asia, with the duty the pack would bear on failing shown at an illustrative rate labeled as such. For the European Union there is no agreement to rely on, so a duty applies, and the example adds the cost of meeting EU battery documentation and labeling requirements. Shipping lithium cells as dangerous goods adds testing and freight surcharges to both markets. Each item becomes dollars per pack and then a share of gross margin, which is where the example finds that the non-tariff costs outweigh the duty.
How a BUS-390 Topic 3 example is structured
The paper is built as a cost ladder climbed twice, once per market. It opens with the product, its bill of materials by country of origin and the price the firm needs abroad. The Canadian ladder comes next, starting with the origin test, then the duty at stake if the test fails, then labeling and dangerous goods handling. The European ladder follows the same rungs so that each line can be compared across markets. A summary table shows every item per pack and as a share of margin, with all rates and fees marked illustrative. A short passage then names the single rule whose change would alter the decision most, which is the origin threshold rather than any headline tariff. The paper finishes with the implication for sourcing, since moving one component could change the Canadian result entirely.
Bill of materials by origin
Cells, casing, management board and assembly are each tagged with a country, because the origin test depends on that breakdown and little else.
The origin test decides Canada
Qualifying under the USMCA rules removes the duty entirely, so the Canadian result turns on where the cells were made.
Europe without an agreement
A duty applies from the first unit, and EU battery documentation requirements add a compliance cost the example estimates and labels.
Dangerous goods as a trade cost
Testing and freight surcharges for lithium cells are counted alongside the tariffs, since the firm pays them just the same.
Every cost against the margin
The summary expresses each item per pack and as a share of gross margin, which shows the non-tariff items outweighing the duty.
Where marks go in BUS-390 Topic 3
Where this topic sheds the most credit is in papers that argue for or against free trade instead of costing a product, because the question concerns a pack of batteries rather than economic policy. Duties quoted with no product classification behind them cannot be checked and are often wrong for the item in question. Leaving out rules of origin is a serious gap, since an agreement only lowers a duty for goods that qualify and many assembled products do not. Non-tariff barriers named without a dollar figure, such as labeling rules mentioned in passing, give a reader nothing to weigh. Totals that are never set against the margin fail to show whether the market is still worth serving. Rates presented as current fact when they are illustrative misstate what the paper actually knows.
Get a BUS-390 Topic 3 example written to your instructions
Send the BUS-390 Topic 3 instructions and the classroom rubric, plus the product and markets you were assigned or would like to use. A custom example is written to those criteria, costing tariffs, origin rules and non-tariff barriers per unit and setting them against margin, delivered in 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free.
BUS-390 Topic 3 questions, answered
Do I need the real tariff rate for my product?
Where the instructions ask for it, yes, and it comes from the importing country's tariff schedule under the product's classification code. Where they do not, an illustrative rate is acceptable if it is labeled. The real risk is stating a rate as fact when it belongs to a different product classification, which faculty in this course often check.
What counts as a non-tariff barrier here?
Anything that raises the cost of selling across the border without being a duty: labeling and language requirements, product testing and certification, documentation rules, quotas and dangerous goods handling. The analysis becomes useful when each one is converted into a figure per unit, because only then can it be compared with the tariff.
Why do rules of origin matter so much?
Because a trade agreement only helps goods that qualify. A product assembled in one member country from parts made outside the agreement may pay the full duty anyway. Many papers assume a zero rate because the two countries have an agreement, and that assumption is exactly what the origin test is there to check.