A finished COM-210 Topic 7 audience adaptation memo example, rebuilding a speech for a hostile or indifferent room without abandoning its claim. Searches like "com 210 topic 7 assignment example", "com210 topic 7 sample" and "com-210 topic 7 example" land here.
What a finished COM-210 Topic 7 audience adaptation memo looks like
The finished memo shows a speech before and after, with reasons between them. It names the new audience precisely, distinguishing hostility, which involves an audience with a position, from indifference, which involves an audience with none, since the two demand opposite openings. It changes the opening first, because a hostile room decides within a sentence and an indifferent one decides whether to attend at all. It reorders the argument so the audience's own concern arrives before the speaker's. It adds concessions and marks what each one costs. Evidence is swapped where the original source carries no weight with this room. The claim itself is unchanged, and the memo says so explicitly, since adaptation that abandons the position is capitulation.
How a COM-210 Topic 7 example is structured
The memo runs change by change with a justification attached to each. It opens by characterizing the new audience and separating hostility from indifference, because the first has an objection to answer and the second has no reason to listen yet. A second section rewrites the opening, which is where both problems are won or lost. A third section reorders the body so material addressing the audience's concern comes before material advancing the speaker's case. A fourth section introduces concessions, naming what is conceded and what it purchases. A fifth section replaces evidence whose source this audience would discount, which is a matter of credibility rather than quality. A closing section confirms what has not changed, stating the claim in the same words as the original.
Hostile and indifferent are different problems
One audience has an objection to be answered; the other has no reason to attend, and the same opening cannot serve both.
The opening rewritten first
Both rooms decide early, so the first sentences absorb most of the adaptation before anything else is touched.
Their concern before yours
The body is reordered so the audience hears its own question addressed before the speaker advances the case.
Concessions priced
Each concession is named along with what it buys, rather than being added generally to sound reasonable.
The claim held unchanged
The memo states the original claim in the same words, marking the line between adapting a speech and abandoning it.
Where marks go in COM-210 Topic 7
The clearest loss is a memo that softens the claim and calls it adaptation, which markers read as the speech giving up. Treating hostility and indifference as one problem produces an opening that answers an objection nobody in an uninterested room has formed. Adaptations confined to tone, where the speaker resolves to be more respectful, change nothing structural and score accordingly. Concessions added without pricing them read as hedging rather than strategy. Evidence left in place when the source carries no credibility with the new audience wastes the strongest material in the speech. Memos that describe changes without showing the before and after leave a marker unable to see whether anything was actually rebuilt.
Get a COM-210 Topic 7 example written to your instructions
Send the COM-210 Topic 7 instructions, your rubric, the speech you built earlier and whatever you know about the new audience. We write a custom example to those criteria, with the opening rebuilt, the order changed, concessions priced and the claim held, in 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free.
COM-210 Topic 7 questions, answered
How is a hostile audience different from a bored one?
A hostile room has a position and is listening for the place your argument fails. An indifferent room has no position and is deciding whether to listen at all. The first needs its objection stated and answered early; the second needs a reason to care before any argument arrives. Openings built for one actively fail with the other.
Does adapting mean weakening my claim?
No, and the distinction carries most of the marks on this topic. Adaptation changes the route: what you open with, what you concede, what order you argue in and which evidence you use. Changing what you are asking the audience to accept is a different speech, and memos that quietly do it while calling it adaptation are marked as capitulation.
What should I concede?
Whatever is true and costs you least while buying the most attention. An audience that hears its strongest point acknowledged accurately concludes you have understood the question, which is what makes the rest of the speech worth their attention. Conceding something you actually need, or conceding vaguely to sound fair, gives away ground for nothing.