A finished DNP-955 Topic 2 project decision record example, recording what was decided, what was rejected and the reason for each choice. Searches like "dnp 955 topic 2 assignment example", "dnp955 topic 2 sample" and "dnp-955 topic 2 example" land here.
What a finished DNP-955 Topic 2 project decision record looks like
The finished example is short and dense. Ten decisions are recorded, each in three lines: what was chosen, what was rejected, and the reason. The rejected options are the useful part, since a committee reading that a comparison group was considered and ruled out for a stated reason will not ask about it, while a proposal silent on the question invites it. Two decisions are marked as provisional, with the date by which each has to close and the person able to close it. The record also captures two decisions that were made by circumstance rather than choice, including a data source selected because it was the only one available, which is worth knowing later.
How a DNP-955 Topic 2 example is structured
The example records decisions in a form somebody else can use. It opens with the project in three sentences, so the record stands alone. A second section lists the settled decisions, each with the choice, the alternatives considered and the reason. A third marks the provisional decisions, giving a date and an owner for each. A fourth records decisions made by circumstance rather than deliberation, which are the ones most likely to be questioned later. A fifth notes what has been agreed with whom, since a decision the site has not confirmed is a preference. A closing section states which decisions would have to be revisited if the practice problem changed, linking back to the previous topic. Each entry stays within three lines, since a record that grows past two pages stops being consulted.
Ten decisions in three lines each
Chosen, rejected and why, which is the shortest form a committee can actually use.
Rejected options recorded
A committee reading that an option was considered and ruled out will not ask about it.
Provisional items dated and owned
Two decisions remain open, each with when it must close and who closes it.
Decisions made by circumstance
A data source chosen because it was the only one available is worth flagging as such.
What is agreed with whom
A decision the site has not confirmed is a preference, and the record distinguishes them.
Where marks go in DNP-955 Topic 2
Planning documents that list activities rather than decisions are the standard version and give a reviewer nothing to examine. A second failure is recording only what was chosen, which leaves every reasonable alternative available for somebody to raise. Marks also go for presenting provisional decisions as settled, since the proposal then rests on things nobody has agreed. Records that never distinguish deliberate choices from forced ones lose information that matters at defense. Decisions listed with no reason cannot be evaluated or defended by anyone else. Documents that run long stop being used, which defeats their purpose entirely. Records assembled after the proposal is written reconstruct reasoning rather than capture it. Documents that list every discussion held bury the ten decisions that actually matter.
Get a DNP-955 Topic 2 example written to your instructions
Send the DNP-955 Topic 2 instructions and the rubric your classroom posts, with any template your program requires. We write a custom example to those criteria, recording choices with their rejected alternatives and reasons, provisional items dated, and what has actually been agreed, in 24 to 48 hours. The first is free.
DNP-955 Topic 2 questions, answered
Why record what was rejected?
Because that is what reviewers ask about. A committee member who wonders why there is no comparison group will raise it unless the record already shows the option was considered and ruled out for a stated reason. Recording rejections costs a line each and removes most of the predictable questions from a defense.
What is a decision made by circumstance?
One where you had no real choice, such as using the only data source available or scheduling around the only period the site would permit. These are worth marking because they get remembered as deliberate, and later somebody asks why you preferred that source. Recording the constraint at the time protects the reasoning.
How long should the document be?
Short enough that people read it. A record running to fifteen pages becomes a document nobody consults, which defeats the purpose. Ten decisions at three lines each fits on two pages and gets used. If a decision needs more explanation than that, the explanation belongs in the proposal and the record points to it.