A finished ENG-105 Topic 3 source integration exercise example, showing borrowed material introduced, reproduced accurately and then read, so no quotation stands alone in the paper. Searches like "eng 105 topic 3 assignment example", "eng105 topic 3 sample" and "eng-105 topic 3 example" land here.
What a finished ENG-105 Topic 3 source integration exercise looks like
The finished exercise handles the same borrowed material several ways, so the difference is visible rather than described. A quotation appears first as it is usually mishandled, standing alone as its own sentence, and then rebuilt with a signal phrase naming who is speaking and why they are worth hearing. Restatements appear beside their originals, which is the only way to show that sentence structure was rebuilt and not merely the vocabulary. Short quotations are absorbed into the writer's own sentence rather than set apart. Every borrowed sentence is followed by the writer's reading of it. The exercise also includes one passage summarized instead of quoted, because quoting it would have wasted the space.
How an ENG-105 Topic 3 example is structured
The exercise is arranged so each move is shown rather than named. It opens with the passage from the supplied reading printed in full, so a reader can check every version against the original. A second part shows the quotation dropped in with no introduction, followed by a note saying exactly what a reader cannot tell from it. A third part rebuilds the same quotation with a signal phrase, a reason the source carries weight, and the reading that follows. A fourth part sets a restatement against the original sentence, marking the words that had to change and the sentence shape that had to change with them. A fifth part weaves a short phrase into the writer's own sentence. A closing part summarizes a longer passage and says why summary was right there.
The original printed for comparison
The supplied passage appears in full at the start, so every later version can be checked against what the source actually said.
Signal phrases that carry weight
Introductions name the source and say why it is worth hearing, instead of announcing an author and stopping there.
Restatement shown beside its original
Placing the two side by side is the only way to demonstrate that sentence structure changed and not merely the vocabulary.
Short quotations absorbed into sentences
A phrase set inside the writer's own sentence keeps the argument in the writer's voice while the evidence still does its work.
Something said after every borrowing
Each piece of borrowed material is followed by the writer's reading of it, because that reading is the graded part.
Where marks go in ENG-105 Topic 3
Marks disappear fastest into quotations left standing alone, which read as evidence the writer collected but did not use. Signal phrases naming only an author, with no indication of why that author is worth quoting, do half the job. Restatements that keep the original sentence shape and swap synonyms are the most expensive error on this topic, because they stay close enough to register as borrowed and are usually marked that way. Long block quotations carrying an argument the writer could have made are read as padding. Quotations followed immediately by another quotation leave no room for the writer at all. Attribution given once and then dropped for a page of borrowed material destroys a reader's ability to tell whose idea is whose.
Get an ENG-105 Topic 3 example written to your instructions
Send the ENG-105 Topic 3 assignment instructions, your classroom rubric and the reading you have been asked to work from. We write a custom example to those criteria, showing quotations introduced and read, restatement set against its original and one passage summarized instead, back in 24 to 48 hours. Your first one costs nothing.
ENG-105 Topic 3 questions, answered
When should I quote instead of paraphrase?
Quote when the exact wording is the point, which usually means the source phrased something in a way you cannot reproduce without losing it, or you intend to take issue with the phrasing itself. Everything else is better paraphrased, because a paraphrase keeps the paper in your voice and shows a marker you understood the material well enough to restate it.
Why do my paraphrases keep getting flagged?
Usually because the sentence structure survived. Changing words while keeping the original order and shape produces something LopesWrite reads as close to the source, and a marker holding the two side by side will agree. A real paraphrase comes from putting the source aside, writing the idea from memory in your own sentence shape, then checking the original for accuracy.
Do I still cite a paraphrase?
Always. The citation marks whose idea it is, and an idea does not become yours by being restated in different words. Papers that cite quotations carefully and leave restatements unattributed are common and lose marks in the same place every time, because a reader can no longer tell where the source ends and the writer begins.