A finished ENG-105 Topic 7 revision plan example, separating changes to argument, order and evidence from the proofreading pass that comes after them. Searches like "eng 105 topic 7 assignment example", "eng105 topic 7 sample" and "eng-105 topic 7 example" land here.
What a finished ENG-105 Topic 7 revision plan looks like
The finished plan is a list of decisions about one specific draft, not a set of intentions about writing. It opens with what the draft currently argues, written out from reading the draft rather than from memory of what it was meant to argue, and the gap between those two is usually where the work sits. Changes are grouped by size, with the ones moving or deleting whole paragraphs listed before the ones fixing sentences, because sentences inside a deleted paragraph never needed fixing. Each change names the paragraph it affects. Evidence gaps are recorded as their own category, since finding support is a different task from rearranging. Proofreading appears once, at the end, with its own short list.
How an ENG-105 Topic 7 example is structured
The plan is ordered by cost, largest first, which is the only order that avoids wasted work. It opens with a restatement of what the draft actually claims, taken from the draft itself, set against what the writer intended to claim. A second section lists structural changes: paragraphs to move, paragraphs duplicating each other, and one section marked for deletion with the reason recorded. A third section handles the argument, naming assertions the draft makes without support and support the draft carries with no assertion to attach it to. A fourth section lists evidence to be found or replaced. A fifth section covers paragraph-level work on whatever survived the earlier passes. A closing section holds proofreading, listed last and limited to errors this writer knows they make.
What the draft actually says
The plan starts from a reading of the paper on the page rather than from the writer's memory of what it was supposed to argue.
Largest changes listed first
Paragraphs to be moved or cut are settled before any sentence is repaired, since work inside a deleted section is wasted.
Assertions and support matched up
Claims with nothing behind them and evidence with nothing to attach to are listed together, because each one is the other's cure.
Every change tied to a paragraph
Items name the place they apply to, so the plan can be worked through and checked off rather than admired.
Proofreading kept as its own pass
The final pass looks only for the errors this writer repeats, and it happens after the argument has stopped moving.
Where marks go in ENG-105 Topic 7
The failure this topic exists to catch is a revision that only proofreads, where a writer reports fixing commas and calls the draft revised. Plans written before rereading describe the paper the writer remembers rather than the one on the page. Repairing sentences in a section that later gets cut wastes the effort that mattered. Changes recorded as intentions, saying the introduction needs work, cannot be carried out or checked off. Plans keeping every paragraph usually mean the writer never asked whether the draft contains anything it does not need. Treating a marker's comments as separate repairs, rather than as evidence of a pattern, fixes the instances and leaves the habit. Plans with no proofreading pass lose the easiest marks available.
Get an ENG-105 Topic 7 example written to your instructions
Send the ENG-105 Topic 7 assignment instructions, your classroom rubric, the draft you are revising and any comments you received on it. We write a custom example to those criteria, with structural changes ordered ahead of sentence work, evidence gaps listed and proofreading kept to a final pass, in 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free.
ENG-105 Topic 7 questions, answered
What is the difference between revising and editing?
Revising changes what the paper says and how it is arranged, which means cutting, moving, adding evidence and rewriting claims. Editing works on sentences, and proofreading works on surface errors. They are ordered that way because editing a paragraph you later delete costs the time the argument needed, and most drafts lose more marks on argument than on commas.
How do I use my marker's comments?
Read them for patterns before acting on any of them. Three notes about vague claims in different paragraphs are one problem appearing three times, and fixing the pattern usually repairs places the marker did not mark. Sort them by size as well, since a note about the paper's organization outranks a note about a missing comma even though the comma is easier.
Should I really delete a whole paragraph?
Sometimes, and writers resist it more than any other change. A paragraph not serving the claim costs you space and dilutes the argument even when the writing in it is good. Keeping a copy somewhere else makes the decision easier, and in most cases the draft reads better afterward, because what remains is doing more work per page.