MGT-455 · Topic 2

MGT-455 Topic 2 timed process flowchart example

Production/Operations Management Grand Canyon University Free custom sample in 24 to 48h

This page holds a complete MGT-455 Topic 2 timed process flowchart example, shown finished. The flowchart follows one custom order through a campus print shop, gives every activity, move, check and wait its own measured minutes, and uses the shop's average work-in-process to explain why a thirty-minute job takes three hours door to door. Early topics in MGT 455 often attach measured times to each stage of a process.

What this page holds

A finished MGT-455 Topic 2 timed process flowchart example, with every symbol timed, waiting separated from work, a rework loop priced and Little's Law applied. Searches like "mgt 455 topic 2 assignment example", "mgt455 topic 2 sample" and "mgt-455 topic 2 example" land here.

What a finished MGT-455 Topic 2 timed process flowchart looks like

The finished flowchart uses the standard symbols for operation, transport, inspection, delay and storage, and every symbol carries a time taken from observation rather than from the shop's price list. Illustrative figures total 30 minutes of work across intake, file preparation, proof check, printing, cutting and packing, plus two minutes of carrying jobs between rooms. The delays are timed as carefully as the work. A rework loop leaves the proof check for the one order in ten that fails, returning it to preparation and adding an expected minute to that stage. The flowchart then applies Little's Law: with eighteen orders in the shop on average and six finished each hour, an order spends three hours inside, so roughly 148 minutes of every visit are spent waiting.

How an MGT-455 Topic 2 example is structured

The example pairs the chart with a short commentary on each of its parts. It opens by defining the process start as the moment an order is logged and the end as the moment it is bagged for pickup, because times mean nothing without fixed endpoints. A second part presents the flowchart itself, one symbol per activity, in the order a job actually moves through the shop. A third part tabulates the times, separating work minutes, transport minutes and waiting minutes into three columns. A fourth part draws the rework loop with its failure rate and computes the expected time it adds. A fifth part applies Little's Law to connect the average number of orders inside the shop with the time each one spends there. The commentary ends by naming the longest wait and the stage it sits in front of, which the next topic will test.

Endpoints fixed before timing starts

The clock starts when an order is logged and stops when it is bagged, so every recorded minute belongs to the same defined process.

Five symbols, each with minutes

Operation, transport, inspection, delay and storage symbols each carry an observed duration, which lets waiting show up on the chart instead of vanishing between boxes.

Work, movement and waiting separated

Three columns split the 30 minutes of work and 2 minutes of carrying from the waiting, which in these illustrative figures is by far the largest share.

A rework loop with its rate

One proof in ten fails and returns to preparation, and the chart prices that loop as an expected extra minute rather than leaving it off.

Little's Law linking queue and time

Eighteen orders inside the shop and six completed per hour imply three hours per order, a figure the observed waiting times then corroborate.

Where marks go in MGT-455 Topic 2

Flowcharts in this topic tend to lose credit at the waits. A chart showing the six work activities in tidy boxes, with nothing between them, reports thirty minutes for a job that customers experience as three hours and so misdescribes the process it claims to map. Symbols used interchangeably, a delay drawn as an operation or storage drawn as a move, make the timing columns impossible to total by type. Rework left off the chart understates the load on file preparation, because the failed proofs return there and take time again. Little's Law is sometimes applied with mismatched units, work-in-process counted in orders but throughput stated per shift, which produces a flow time that cannot be right. A chart that never names its longest wait hands the reader a picture and no finding.

Get an MGT-455 Topic 2 example written to your instructions

Send the MGT-455 Topic 2 instructions, the rubric posted in your classroom and the process your section assigned or one you can observe. We write a custom example to those criteria, with endpoints fixed, every symbol timed, waits separated from work, rework priced and Little's Law applied, delivered in 24 to 48 hours. Your first one is free.

MGT-455 Topic 2 questions, answered

What symbols does a process flowchart use?

Most operations texts use five: a circle for an operation that changes the item, an arrow for transport, a square for inspection, a D shape for delay and a triangle for storage. Some courses use a simpler box and diamond format instead. Whichever the rubric asks for, each symbol should carry a time, since a symbol alone says what happens without saying how long it takes.

What is Little's Law and why use it here?

It states that the average number of items in a process equals the throughput rate multiplied by the average time each item spends inside. Knowing any two gives the third. In a flowchart assignment it checks the timings: if the observed minutes imply a flow time very different from what the work-in-process count implies, one of the measurements is wrong.

Should waiting time really be on the chart?

Yes, because in most processes it is the largest block of elapsed time and the one customers notice. A chart recording only work minutes makes a slow process look fast. Timing the delays also points later topics in the right direction, since long waits usually form in front of whichever stage limits output.