A finished HIM-370 Topic 1 system type inventory example, sorting a composite hospital's systems by the job each was bought to do and the data each one owns. Searches like "him 370 topic 1 assignment example", "him370 topic 1 sample" and "him-370 topic 1 example" land here.
What a finished HIM-370 Topic 1 system type inventory looks like
The finished inventory is a table of systems with a paragraph of consequence under each group. Its composite hospital runs an EHR core with clinical documentation, order entry, results review and a medication administration record; a registration and ADT system; laboratory, pharmacy and radiology information systems, the last paired with a PACS for images; a revenue cycle system; and the HIM department's own encoder, deficiency tracking and release of information tools. For each one the table records the purpose it was bought for, the facts it is the system of record for, the systems that read from it, and what stops working elsewhere if it goes down. A separate row is kept for the master patient index, because every other system borrows its identity of the patient from there.
How an HIM-370 Topic 1 example is structured
Groups rather than vendors give the inventory its order. A short opening states the rule the table follows: each system is described by the data it owns, never by the screens it shows. The clinical core comes first, with documentation, order entry and results review treated as components of one record rather than as separate products. Ancillary systems follow as a group, laboratory, pharmacy and radiology, each with the departmental work it was designed around and the results it sends back to the core. Administrative and financial systems form the third group, starting with registration, since every encounter begins there. HIM's own tools close the table. After the table, a dependency passage names the three systems whose failure would stop the most others, and a final paragraph states which facts two systems both claim to own, since those are where conflicts later appear.
Described by the data each owns
Every row states which facts the system is the source of truth for, so a reader can tell whose record wins when two systems disagree about a patient.
Ancillary systems kept as a group
Laboratory, pharmacy and radiology information systems are grouped because each was built around one department's own work and returns its results to the clinical core.
Identity borrowed from one place
The master patient index sits in a row of its own, since registration, ancillary and billing systems all take the patient's identity from it rather than creating their own.
What stops if it goes down
A dependency column records which other systems lose function during an outage, which turns a list of products into a picture of how the hospital actually runs.
Facts claimed by two systems
The closing paragraph names data such as allergies and medication lists that more than one system records, since shared ownership is where later integration trouble begins.
Where marks go in HIM-370 Topic 1
Inventories that describe each system by its features lose the most here, because a feature list says what a vendor built and nothing about the role the system plays in the hospital. A table that names the EHR, the laboratory system and the billing system without saying which facts each one owns leaves the reader unable to settle a conflict between them. Drafts often treat the EHR as one product and miss that order entry, documentation and results review behave as separate components with separate failure points. Leaving out the master patient index, or filing it under registration as a detail, hides the one system every other row depends on. Some papers omit the HIM department's own tools, as if the course were about other people's systems. An inventory with no dependency column describes parts without showing how they connect.
Get an HIM-370 Topic 1 example written to your instructions
Send the HIM-370 Topic 1 instructions and the rubric from your classroom, with any facility or scenario the assignment describes. We write a custom example to those criteria, with each system described by the data it owns, the dependencies between systems shown and shared ownership of facts identified, in 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free.
HIM-370 Topic 1 questions, answered
Is the EHR one system or several?
For inventory purposes it is best treated as several components under one name. Clinical documentation, order entry, results review and the medication administration record share a database in many products, yet each carries its own workflow, its own users and its own way of failing. Listing them separately lets the inventory show which component another system actually depends on, which matters as soon as an interface is discussed in later topics.
Where should the master patient index sit in the inventory?
In a row of its own, placed near the top. Registration creates identities, but the index is what every other system consults to decide which patient a message, order or result belongs to. Filing it as a feature of registration hides that dependency. A composite hospital with an enterprise index across several facilities makes the point more strongly, since one index then serves systems that were bought separately.
Should vendor names appear in the inventory?
Only when the assignment calls for them, and even then they belong in a secondary column. The inventory describes what each system does and what data it owns, which stays true when the product is replaced. A table organized by vendor tends to drift into features and versions, which change with every release and say little about the role the system plays. Composite examples usually leave vendors unnamed for that reason.