A finished MGT-470 Topic 1 integration responsiveness analysis example, placing business activities by cross-border pressure and assigning each HR decision to the level that activity requires. Searches like "mgt 470 topic 1 assignment example", "mgt470 topic 1 sample" and "mgt-470 topic 1 example" land here.
What a finished MGT-470 Topic 1 integration responsiveness analysis looks like
Customers, not HR, open the finished analysis. A composite Pittsburgh maker of robotic grippers sells to automakers that run assembly lines in the United States, Germany, Mexico and Japan, and those customers expect the same tooling, the same changeover time and the same service response at every plant. That pushes engineering, quality and field service toward global integration. Labor relations, pay levels, working time and customer contact in Japan face strong pressure for local responsiveness. The analysis places each activity on Prahalad and Doz's grid and names the firm's overall position, closest to Bartlett and Ghoshal's global type, with transnational demands in service. HR decisions then follow the activity they support: technician certification and engineering grades are set centrally, while wage setting and works council relations stay local.
How an MGT-470 Topic 1 example is structured
The analysis is ordered so that no HR decision is placed until the business activity it serves has been placed first. Its opening part describes the firm, its four sites and what its automotive customers require across borders, drawn from service contracts. The two pressures, integration and responsiveness, are then explained, along with why a single activity can face both at once. A third part places eight business activities on the grid, each with the customer or legal fact that puts it there. A fourth part names the firm's overall configuration using Bartlett and Ghoshal's typology and admits where the fit is loose. A fifth part assigns HR decisions to the level that owns them, headquarters, region or country, following the activity each supports. The closing part lists the decisions whose placement is contested, such as the plant manager pipeline, for later topics to test.
Customers who cross borders
Automakers running identical lines in four countries require the same changeover time and service response everywhere, which sets the firm's integration pressure.
Eight activities placed on the grid
Engineering, quality and field service sit toward integration, while labor relations, pay setting and Japanese account management sit toward local responsiveness.
A configuration named, loosely
The firm fits Bartlett and Ghoshal's global type for products, and the analysis concedes that field service shows transnational demands the label does not capture.
HR decisions follow their activity
Technician certification and engineering grades are owned at headquarters because the service they support is integrated, while wages and working time are owned locally.
Placements left open for later
The plant manager pipeline could sit at either level, and the analysis names it as the first contested placement for the following topics to settle.
Where marks go in MGT-470 Topic 1
Opening papers here most often lose credit by writing a global HR strategy that no business fact supports. A paper promising to attract and retain global talent, with no statement of what customers require across borders, has described an aspiration common to every multinational. Placing activities on the grid without the fact that puts them there leaves every placement arguable. Analyses treating the firm as wholly global or wholly multinational ignore that engineering and labor relations face opposite pressures inside the same company. Citing Bartlett and Ghoshal as though the typology were a rigid classification overstates it, since firms usually mix configurations. Papers assigning HR decisions by habit, headquarters for everything senior and countries for everything else, have derived nothing from the strategy. The strongest papers leave contested placements visibly open.
Get an MGT-470 Topic 1 example written to your instructions
Send the MGT-470 Topic 1 instructions and the rubric from your classroom, with the organization or case the assignment names. A custom example is written to those requirements, with cross-border customer needs stated, activities placed on the grid with reasons, the configuration named and HR decisions assigned to the level that owns them, in 24 to 48 hours. The first one is free.
MGT-470 Topic 1 questions, answered
What is the integration responsiveness grid?
A framework associated with C. K. Prahalad and Yves Doz that plots pressure for global integration, such as global customers and scale economies, against pressure for local responsiveness, such as national regulation and differing customer needs. Activities within one firm can sit in different places on it, so the example places activities individually before naming any overall position.
What are Bartlett and Ghoshal's four types?
Christopher Bartlett and Sumantra Ghoshal described international, multinational, global and transnational organizations, differing in how far strategy and control are centralized and how far subsidiaries adapt locally. The transnational type seeks integration and responsiveness together, along with learning across units. HR papers use the typology to explain why one firm centralizes HR decisions that another delegates to its subsidiaries.
Why start with customers rather than HR practices?
Because a practice can only be judged global or local against something the business needs to be the same, or free to differ, across countries. Customers who operate in several countries and expect identical service create that need most directly. Starting from HR practices tends to reproduce the current division of decisions and justify it afterward, which leaves the strategy unconnected to anything.